Compare
Islo vs Docker
Docker gives you isolation. Islo gives agents a place to actually work.
A container is not a dev environment. Islo adds persistent computers, scoped tool access, browsers and services for verification, and gateway audit.
| Islo | Docker | |
|---|---|---|
Process isolation | ✓ | ✓ |
Persistent state across reconnects | ✓ | partial |
Credential injection at egress | ✓ | — |
Browser + service orchestration | ✓ | — |
Per-request audit | ✓ | — |
Zero infra to maintain | ✓ | — |
Private cloud / BYOC | ✓ | ✓ |
Choose Islo when
You want long-running autonomous agents without operating orchestration, gateway, and audit yourself.
Choose Docker when
You already run a container platform and want to build the agent layer in-house.
Try Islo on your next workflow.
Common questions
Is Islo a drop-in replacement for Docker?
A container is not a dev environment. Islo adds persistent computers, scoped tool access, browsers and services for verification, and gateway audit.
Can I try both before deciding?
Yes. Start with one workflow you understand on Islo and compare results against your current setup.
Does Islo work with my existing harness?
Islo is harness-agnostic. Run Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or your own agent.
What about pricing?
Islo is pay-as-you-go. See /pricing for rates.
Can I run in my own cloud?
Yes. BYOC mode runs agent computers in your VPC.