Compare
Islo vs DIY
Kubernetes, Docker, scripts, and a homegrown gateway can work. Islo is the layer you would otherwise build and maintain.
Many teams start by wiring together containers, CI jobs, and ad hoc API keys. Islo replaces the control plane: persistent agent computers, credential injection, verification, scheduling, and audit in one product.
| Islo | DIY | |
|---|---|---|
Persistent agent computers | ✓ | partial |
Gateway credential injection | ✓ | — |
Per-request audit | ✓ | — |
Ticket-to-PR orchestration | ✓ | ✓ |
Browser + full stack verification | ✓ | partial |
Full control of every layer | partial | ✓ |
Choose Islo when
You want autonomous agents this quarter, not after a platform team ships gateway, audit, and orchestration.
Choose DIY when
You have a platform team ready to own agent infra end to end and want every knob in-house.
Try Islo on your next workflow.
Common questions
Is Islo a drop-in replacement for DIY?
Many teams start by wiring together containers, CI jobs, and ad hoc API keys. Islo replaces the control plane: persistent agent computers, credential injection, verification, scheduling, and audit in one product.
Can I try both before deciding?
Yes. Start with one workflow you understand on Islo and compare results against your current setup.
Does Islo work with my existing harness?
Islo is harness-agnostic. Run Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or your own agent.
What about pricing?
Islo is pay-as-you-go. See /pricing for rates.
Can I run in my own cloud?
Yes. BYOC mode runs agent computers in your VPC.